HSUS Sued for Defamation, Malicious Prosecution, Conspiracy, and Abuse of Process

HorseshoeSuedSeveral years ago we wrote about the case of Denisa Malott, an Arkansas woman who had her horses seized by HSUS for allegedly not caring for them—only to find that the horses were, after the seizure, apparently dropped off in a field and left without adequate food and water, despite HSUS’s promise that the animals would be taken to a care facility.

Previously, Malott had filed a complaint with the FBI asking for an investigation under the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act. And now the other shoe has dropped: Malott has filed a lawsuit. Read it here.

The suit, filed in February in the Circuit Court of Stone County, Arkansas, seeks unspecified damages for defamation, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trespass to real property, trespass to chattels, and conspiracy. The defendants are the Humane Society of the United States, HSUS’s state legislative director Desiree Bender, the Humane Society of Missouri, and three other individuals.

The seizure occurred in November 2009, after which Malott was charged with 25 felony counts of animal cruelty. Those charges were later dropped to misdemeanors—and then those charges were completely dropped altogether, in November 2011. In short, Malott had to sit under the looming threat of criminal prosecution for two years after the seizure that was conducted by HSUS and others.

Following the seizure, HSUS put out a press release in which HSUS state director Desiree Bender alleged the horses were living in “deplorable conditions” and HSUS claimed that the “horses are being taken to The Rescue Wranglers’ pasture in White Hall, Ark., where they will receive the attention they deserve.”

But Malott alleges that the attention the horses got was far from what they deserved.

Instead of going to The Rescue Wranglers’ pasture three hours away, the horses were found close to the seizure site. What’s more, they allegedly were found to be without adequate food and water—essentially dropped off in a pasture, from the sound of it.

Malott wasn’t allowed to feed her horses because of the pending criminal charges, but she eventually won physical custody of the animals and was able to feed them. The June/July 2010 edition of MareConnection has more details about the seizure and subsequent events.

In short, Malott’s lawsuit asserts that the allegations of HSUS and others were false, which damaged her reputation and business. She’s essentially saying: “Prove it.” So we’ll see what HSUS has got to back up its actions. But if her horses were seized under false pretenses or HSUS made defamatory statements, then the organization could be pretty deep in manure.

Two other HSUS “raids” have spurred lawsuits: One in South Dakota and one in Hawaii. The South Dakota case is still active and is slowly progressing. HSUS is also facing a federal lawsuit filed under anti-racketeering statutes. As always, we’ll keep an eye on this case and keep you posted as to any developments.

Posted on 05/21/2013 at 6:22 pm by Humane Watch Team.

Topics: Main

Permalink

  • Songbrook

    Thank you for keeping us up to speed on the misdeeds of the biggest scammers in the US.

  • Animal rights activists have been lobbying for felony animal cruelty laws for some time. They fail to respect their success by allowing trained law enforcement officers to investigate and collect evidence. Using volunteers for criminal investigations is flawed. Another case in Queen Anne’s Maryland allegedly has HSUS volunteers on tape agreeing to score horses at a level that indicates neglect rather than remaining impartial. The scoring system used was for pregnancy condition and one can’t simply be shown the chart and thus qualified to use it. The charges in that case were also reduced and animals returned.

  • heber Norckauer

    What give HSUS the right to enter private property, much less seize property? They are not the Government.

  • Finrod Felagund

    I hope she takes HSUS for every penny they have and then some. HSUS pretends to care about the welfare of animals but they treat animals far worse than they claim the people they harass treat them. They are hypocrites and scum of the lowest order.

  • Ashwaruda

    Animals should not be treated cruelly is a fact. Conducting horrific tests on them, decimating wild animal populations all these are not ‘Humane’. But some of the animal rights activists behave like extremists & extortionists. They are intolerant and sometimes their logic defies common sense. They even enforce the concept ‘vegetarianism’ on carnivores like dogs, cats etc. Being ‘Humane’ means being ‘balanced’.

  • interestedobserver2

    Really? HSUS has some sort of “law enforcement” power? I thought the County Sheriff had to do any of that sort of thing. Or is this just another example of some jackhammer deciding they are all powerful and have some sort of “right” to intervene without due process? Time for this HSUS woman to be up on charges if true.

  • Desiree Bender

    FYI:..This lawsuit was DISMISSED in Stone County AR Circuit Court by Judge Weaver on September 16, 2013.

  • Zorbee

    for second there, I thought a man named Hesus was being sued…