Sep 07 2010

Saving Animals Can Be Rewarding (Maybe…)

A Humane Society of the United States press release caught our eye this morning:

The Humane Society of the United States is offering a reward up to $2,500 for information leading to the identification, arrest and conviction of the person or persons responsible for the death of one dog and the wounding of a second dog on Jonah Hall Road in Wrightsville, Ga., on Saturday.

If you look back through all of HSUS’s press releases for 2010, you’ll find two dozen of these “offering a reward” promotions. And zero press releases announcing that a reward has actually been paid. What’s going on?

It’s a great idea to offer a reward any time you want a criminal brought to justice. Large amounts of money can be a serious inducement for “Good Samaritans” to come forward and turn their friends or family in. (Remember the Unabomber? His brother collected $1 million for doing the right thing.)

Is $2,500 a large amount of money? In the grand scheme of things, no. Which makes us wonder if it’s just a way to get publicity—and if the reward is never paid, it’s free publicity.

It would be interesting to know how many arrests have been made (and convictions gained) in the cases for which HSUS has offered reward money. Is the group just making these token offers and tossing them in a drawer somewhere?

If anyone knows of a case where HSUS has actually paid a reward to someone for information about an animal-cruelty crime, we’d like to know.

Got a comment? Be sure to leave your thoughts below. From August 23 to October 29, 2010 we will be choosing the two best comments each week of 25 words or more, and awarding $100 (each) to the local pet shelters of the commenters' choice. Click here for more information and the official rules.

Related Organizations

Posted on 09/07/2010 at 12:30 PM by the HumaneWatch Team

Courtroom DramaPets • (10) Comments

Share

Comments 

I’ve always wondered about that.  It seems anytime we have a tragic/dramatic case in the horse industry, HSUS is quick to step in with a $5000 to $10,000 reward. Personally, I think that offer would be better served by giving it to the veterinarians or agencies that are saddled with the bills.  But, it is a “good” way for HSUS to make their presence known, and lull us into thinking that they actually support the ownership and competitive use of horses.

Posted by linn on 09/07 at 02:39 PM

Interesting, no breed mentioned.

Posted by Mary Lou on 09/07 at 02:46 PM

I agree with your observations of the true nature of these “rewards”. I have seen rewards offered by HSUS for information on dog fighting, and it is clearly for effect above all else.  I just can’t imagine that the piddling amount of money offered ($2500 to $5000) would be bringing any friends and family members of these dog fighters to the police. Not even walking around money for these bad dudes, and certainly nothing to compare with the value of the life of a “snitch” in these circles. Who would risk it?

Never heard of a payout, either. You’d think a payout would be a powerful message . . .

Posted by Charlotte Allmann on 09/07 at 03:35 PM

There is a Humane Society in Bellefontaine, OH that is about to close due to lack of funds.  There are good people working there - people who really care and will come out 24-7 to help an animal.  This I know is true - I used to work midnight shift at the police department and at least 3 or 4 times a week, I had to call them out.
Can you help this facility before it closes down?  They really need financial help.
Lyn Marker
Huntsville, Ohio

Posted by Lyn L Marker on 09/07 at 03:40 PM

I would be interested in hearing about that as well…  With how publicity hungry they are, you can darn well bet that they wouldn’t give away a couple thousand bucks without at least getting a press release out of the deal.

When confronted with the fact that HSUS does little to help shelters, they always fall back on the convenient philosophy that they are treating the “disease and not the symptoms.”  Meaning that they can’t be bothered with the individual animals (or the underfunded shelters who care for them) because they are taking care of the “big picture.”

So why is it that they are willing to part with thousands of dollars to catch just one criminal, yet they are still SO unwilling to share even a small portion of their millions with shelters?

In this case, it seems that struggling shelters across this country are the bigger picture when compared to one isolated incident involving one or two animals.

Shelters may still be a symptom, but HSUS seems to forget that often it’s not the disease that kills you, but complications from the symptoms.  To treat the situation with antibiotics but allow a fever to spike is ignorant to say the least.

Posted by Katie H. on 09/07 at 04:03 PM

Does the press release mention the manner of death and wounding? One presumes gunshot. Hit-by-car? Poisoned? Clubbed?  Are they helping with the vet bill for the wounded dog? What were the dogs doing that they were killed and wounded? I live in a rural ag. county in which dogs roaming at-large who are witnessed harassing livestock may LEGALLY be shot and if necessary killed in order to protect the livestock.

Not too long ago they were offering a similar reward for info leading to the identification etc of whoever was responsible for shooting a few Canada Geese.  Will running over a squirrel on the Interstate become a felony hit-and-run?

Posted by M.E. Papin on 09/07 at 04:41 PM

How do we know these are even REAL pleas for help?  They could easily put out ads for a reward for a fictitious event, just to get free publicity.  Or they might just choose events that are cold cases, where the chance of actually having to pay out a reward would be slim to none.  It makes you think, doesn’t it?  Free ads, free publicity.  So they can pull on people’s heartstrings and try to make themselves look like saints to get more donations “look at what we are doing to help animals”.  Do they ask for donations in these ads?

I am normally a very trusting and optimistic person, I try to see the good in everything and give everyone a chance, but HSUS and ruined it for themselves with me, I wouldn’t trust them to take care of an ant farm.

I trust places like Happily Ever After Sanctuary, in Marion, WI.  They help animals, WITHOUT a political agenda.

Posted by Michelle on 09/07 at 07:10 PM

I love animals. We had a small zoo so to speak. I recently adopted a dog from a shelter. Took him to the vet and he is now a special needs dog. Thats ok. I will make sure he has everything. Once I move I will get a second dog. I have no problem with spending money to help animals. The only thing in return I would want is to see is the animal happy. I hope if they do find the person that did this. Punishment wont be harsh enough until Animal abuse and cruelty are felonies. I will be the first to sign any petition. Any death of an animal should be murder in first degree. There is no difference between humans and animals oh wait their is animals are way smarter.

Posted by Cheryl on 09/08 at 09:46 AM

Cheryl I wonder about your thoughts. If a squirrel hunter shoots one, do you think he should be charged with first degree murder?

Posted by regan on 09/08 at 03:40 PM

Cheryl,
No offense, but people like you scare the hell out of me. People like you is why I give every extra penny I have to people who are working to stop every hare-brained scheme HSUS and others come up with. People like you is why I spend every extra penny to candidates that will vote against every animal rights law.
Only someone insane would honestly believe a person should be charged with murder for killing an animal.

Posted by Shelly on 09/08 at 09:16 PM

Comments are moderated, and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. Extremely lengthy comments and those that contain obscenities may be edited before they are posted.

Add a comment:

Name:

Email: (will not be displayed)

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

« Back to blog homepage