What’s Humane About Population Control?

Carter Dillard is not a household name, but perhaps it should be to anyone who runs a farm. Dillard is an attorney "of counsel" with the Humane Society of the United States, and a law professor at Loyola. He’s the guy HSUS sends if, say, you run an upstate New York duck farm that HSUS would be happy to see out of business.

Dillard was formerly the General Counsel of Compassion Over Killing (COK), a radical vegan activist group founded by HSUS senior staffer Paul Shapiro and former HSUS vice president Miyun Park. Josh Balk also came to the Mother Ship via COK, Dillard is also involved with Four Feet Forward, an Oregon-based group that helps “nonhuman species,” promotes vegetarianism, and provides free media and legal services to smaller animal advocacy groups.

Dillard also has an, um, interesting avocation. He's a research fellow at the Optimum Population Trust, a United Kingdom-based think tank that promotes the view that Planet Earth can support, at most, 5.1 billion people. That means that in order to be sustainable, today’s world population would have to shrink. A lot.

Here's Dillard in action on the FOX Business channel, arguing about overpopulation with Stuart Varney:

Carter Dillard has also published academic papers in law journals arguing that having children is not a basic human right. In a 2007 essay titled “Rethinking the Procreative Right,” he challenges whether people have a right to have kids as they see fit.

That's not a joke:

The right to procreate, correctly defined, is a right at least to replace oneself, and at most to procreate up to a point that optimizes the public good.

And what does “the public good” entail? Dillard says that involves the public’s right to “access wilderness and natural biological diversity (including other species).”

Hmmm.

More on that thorny "other species" angle in a moment. But here’s a question worth exploring: Why does HSUS, an animal-oriented group, so often seem preoccupied with concern for human population? Let’s review:

  • In the book Bloodties, a pre-HSUS Wayne Pacelle tells author Ted Kerasote that “I certainly don't plan to have children. I take it as a very serious personal responsibility not to put another consumer on this planet.” And Heidi Prescott (now an HSUS vice president) tells Kerasote that she had herself sterilized at an early age, saying: “If I gave up animal rights and zero population work, I'd go into prison reform.”
  • The unknown author of the “HSUS X-Files” report writes that HSUS gave $2,500 in 1994 to a group called “Zero Population Growth,” an offshoot of notorious population doomsday merchant Paul Ehrlich that today brands itself under the name “Population Connection.” You might remember Ehrlich—he wrote The Population Bomb forty years ago, predicting that the world's population would crash because food production couldn’t possibly keep up with population growth. (Obviously, his theory was an “epic fail.”)
  • In HSUS's 1991 Report of the President (see page 50), then-HSUS Vice President for Environment Jan Hartke noted that HSUS’s environmental section had addressed “the human population explosion.” In fact, Hartke brags:

The Environment section took a leadership role in initiating and advocating a Population Priority Statement whose purpose is to underscore, for the first time, the consensus judgement [sic] of environmental organizations that “the increase in population and in resource consumption are basic causes of human suffering and environmental degradation and must become major priorities for national and international action.”

Why is this a talking point (much less a major priority) of a supposed animal protection group?

It only make sense (to us, anyway) if you bring Carter Dillard back into the equation. Remember: He believes that the right to have kids should be balanced against “other rights”—including those of “non-human species.”

So if people are just another animal species, and if our “rights” must be considered on the same level as those of deer, pigs, and lab rats, then it’s not too big a stretch to require that we thin our own numbers for the purpose of making room for animals. And if you're laser-focused on the supposed "rights" of chickens, it makes a twisted sort of sense to demote all of us "people" to the status of blind automatons whose nasty habit of consuming animals for fuel violates the rights of countless livestock.

Wayne Pacelle himself put the cherry on the sundae in a 1998 interview with Vegan.com founder Erik Marcus. (Pacelle was HSUS Senior Vice President at the time):

Human population growth is ultimately one of the most significant [things] that we as a movement have to grapple with. It's a simple equation that more consumers translates into more animals raised for food.

Don't get us wrong: We're not saying that it's a good idea to subject the planet to a limitless number of people. But we find it remarkable how an idea like "zero population growth" can be co-opted by activists who find their own narrow reasons to hoist its banner high.

On the other hand, insects outnumber us poor humans by several orders of magnitude. And there are 24 billion chickens on the planet. So maybe we're the oppressed minority after all. We say let's thin the herd of broiler hens. Preferably with the aid of some BBQ sauce.

Related People:

Posted on 03/31/2010 at 2:14 am by humanewatch.

Topics: Audio & Video

Permalink

  • UNAgenda21

    This article hits our collective coffin nails squarely on the head in citing the world’s ultimate problem of too many people.

    The well developed blueprint to deal with man’s extinction from pollution is officially known as United Nations Agenda 21. The ultimate conclusion already reached is that for any of the “sustainability” principles of United Nations Agenda 21 to work, the human population must be immediately and severely reduced. Here are the hard facts of life, or more precisely, facts of death:

    UN commissioned scientists – the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
    (IPCC), the Royal Society, the World Academy of Arts & Science, World Population
    Fund, World Bank, the UN, NASA, 178 countries, The Earth Charter, etc., etc.,
    have declared a global emergency…terminal Climate Change caused by humans. The
    elites are working on implementing the solution via UN Agenda 21, whether scientifically sound or not. The real problem is over-population.

    The solution is Agenda 21. The bottom-line is this:

    Agenda 21’s “sustainability” basic theme relies on the CO2 argument.
    Overpopulation saturating the atmosphere with fossil fuel CO2, will kill the Earth by 2050.
    Even if CO2 emissions fall to zero the plague upon the Earth will remain us …
    you and me.

    The UN commissioned Global Biodiversity Assessment Report, page 773, suggests a
    population reduction to 1 billion people. (An exception is provided: if the
    world is de-industrialized (meaning pre-1765), then a peasant population of 4-5 billion is to be allowed). http://www.freedomadvocates.org/images/pdf/Unsustainables_UN_Global…

    The Report’s bottom line is clear:
    ‘Population growth has exceeded the capacity of the biosphere.’
    See Mikhail Gorbachev of Earth Council and its Earth Charter.
    hhttp://omegatimes.com/article.php?intid=1474
    http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/content/pages/Read-the-Charter.html

    Population will reach 10.8 billion by 2050; 15.8 billion by 2100. To feed
    it, food production must increase in the next 36 years by upwards of 100%. Water
    shortages are unsolvable. See: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Excel-Data/population.htm
    http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/longrange2/WorldPop2300final.pdf

    Climate Change Seen Posing Risk to Food Supplies
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/02/science/earth/science-panel-warns-of-risks-to-food-supply-from-climate-change.html?_r=0

    CO2 emissions must drop to zero immediately to keep PPMs below 450 and keep
    average temperature from increasing by more than 2 degrees Celsius, the allowable
    ceilings. (A much bigger and imminent threat recently identified is the release of gigatons of methane now taking place due to Arctic ice melts and projected methane release from thawing of the Russian tundra permafrost.) But in order to feed so many, CO2 would have to drastically rise, not fall. So the only conclusion is we must depopulate now by 5-6 billion and slash CO2 fossil fuel emissions to zero. The iron fist of communism is needed to make it work. We are
    already essentially there.
    http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html

    And that is exactly what is being undertaken, with help from UN Agenda 21 and
    well known billionaires, who contribute huge sums to a broad array of UN and other population control programs. It’s all there if you do the research, as I have.
    See UN World Economic and Social Survey 2011 for a very explicit summary of this whole non-fiction agenda:
    http://www.amazon.com/World-Economic-Social-Survey-2011/dp/9211091632
    http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wess/wess_archive/2011wess.pdf

    Geoengineering is increasingly being sold to us as a way to cool the planet by
    spraying the skies with toxic chemicals to block the sun, known as Strategic Aerosol Geoengineering (SAG) or Solar Radiation Management (SRM). Who knows what other
    mission it may have? All I know is that they are dead serious.

    “A Hard Rain’s Agonna Fall.” Bob Dylan

    Good luck, Comrades.