HSUS Lobbyist Slapped Down in Oregon

It’s January, which means a number of state legislatures are back in session. And that also means HSUS is busy prowling the halls for its “state lobby days” and trying to push a number of bills, from hunting restrictions to farming restrictions to pet-buying restrictions.

Some folks tweeted us a video the other day of HSUS lobbyist Scott Beckstead testifying in Oregon against a proposal to codify the state Department of Fish and Wildlife’s recent decision to delist gray wolves as endangered. HSUS, of course, doesn’t want wolves delisted because it would potentially allow hunting of the animals, and HSUS is very much opposed to hunting. (It’s unclear what limits on wolf populations HSUS supports. You’d think they could be prowling the periphery of every small town in Oregon before HSUS might agree to reasonable limits.)

A couple of state reps from both sides of the aisle challenge Beckstead, with one warning, “Be very careful.” Beckstead warns that opening the door to future wolf hunting could backfire if, say, a hunter posts a pic on social media with his take. The not-so-subtle message is that HSUS would be happy to pour gas on the fire.

But the lawmakers pushed back at this notion, noting that the grizzliest videos they’ve seen haven’t been a hunter with a dead animal—they’ve been wolves chasing down and ripping apart still-alive prey.

It’s an interesting point. Instead of letting HSUS play offense against hunting, what if hunters showed fields of dead sheep and said, “This is what HSUS supports”? It’s not demagoguery if it’s true—and that’s the cost of HSUS’s litigation and lobbying against letting wildlife managers use science to manage dangerous predators.

Posted on 01/26/2016 at 10:44 am by Humane Watch Team.

Topics: Wildlife

Permalink

  • sybil

    hunting wolves is wrong period re place them somewhere else families of wolves all intact so that they survive… agh

    • JanCinLV

      Wolves are very territorial. Capturing and releasing them in a different area breaks up families (packs) and leaves the relocated animals in an unsecure (to them) environment where they don’t know where prey or other predators might be. It is much more humane to have controlled hunting than to abandon them in unfamiliar territory to starve.

    • Bob

      Central Park comes to mind.

  • meghan august august

    Seeing how they ignore science and would rather have the public, pets,livestock makes me just angry. I am not surprised. But it still makes me angry. Then to say we will sue if we don’t get our way sounds like a child that did not get the candy they wanted!

  • al smith

    did he say depravity? wow

  • Frances LiBrandi

    Living in Long Beach, California we are overrun with Coyotes. It is an urban area and we have lost too many pets to the Coyotes and our City Council does not care. Coyotes are climbing our 6 foot fences (per City Code) and actually killing our pets in their backyards. The City Council has put Animal Rights Activists (that do not live in the City) concerns ahead of the people who live in the City. Nice to see Oregon doing what is best for their State.